
CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VEDANT
ASSET LIMITED
CIN:
U74900JH2015PLC003020
Registered
Office: 3rd
Floor, Gayways House Pee Pee Compound Ranchi Jharkhand 834001, India
Telephone No.: +91- 9304955502 ; E-mail: cs@vedantasset.com
Website: www.vedantasset.com
CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
INTRODUCTION
The Company conducts its operations under the directions of
Board of Directors within the framework
laid down by various statutes, more particularly by the Companies Act, 2013,
SEBI Regulations, Memorandum and Articles of Association and Code of Conduct and policies formulated by the Company for its internal
execution. The present policy for
performance evaluation is being put
into place in accordance with the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI LODR on Board Evaluation. Such an
evaluation procedure will provide a fine system of checks and balances on the performance of the directors and will
ensure that they exercise their powers
in a rational manner.
As
required under SEBI LODR and Companies Act, 2013, the evaluation of the Board
involves multiple levels:
· Board as a whole
· Committees of the Board
· Individual Directors (including Managing Director, Independent Directors, Non-Independent
Directors, etc.)
With
an aim to maintain an energized, proactive and effective Board, the Board is
committed to a continuing process
of recommending and laying down the criteria to evaluate the performance of the entire Board of the Company.
OBJECT
The Board evaluation policy aims at:
a.
Bring closer
working relationship among Board members
b.
Endorse those individual
directors and the Board as a whole:
i.
Who works efficiently by using the Board’s time constructively to maximize the strength; and
ii.
Who works effectively as a governing
body in achieving
Company’s objectives and tackle any shortcomings.
c.
Facilitate
the decision on levelling the composition of remuneration, for making it
reasonable and sufficient, to attract, retain and motivate directors, with aim
to sustain the required quality to run the company successfully
DEFINITIONS:
In this Policy, words and expressions shall
have the meaning assigned to them below:
i.
“Act” shall mean the
Companies Act, 2013 and rules framed thereunder, notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs,
Government of India,
as amended from time to time;
ii.
“Board” shall
mean the Board of Directors
of the Company;
iii. “Company” shall mean Vedant
Asset Limited, incorporated under the provisions of the Act;
iv.
“Directors” shall mean all the
members of the Board of Directors of the Company, including the Independent Directors;
v.
“Listing
Regulations” shall
mean The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015,
as amended from time
to time.
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BOARD
The overall effectiveness of the Board shall be measured on
the basis of the ratings obtained by each
Director and accordingly the Board shall decide the Appointments,
Re-appointments and Removal of the
non-performing Directors of the Company. For this reason, based on the fore stated criteria of evaluation the remuneration of
the Directors and Key Managerial Personnel shall be determined and reviewed
from time to time.
RESPONSIBILITY OF BOARD / INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
It shall be the duty of the Board, who shall be supported by
the Management to organize the evaluation
process and accordingly conclude the steps required to be taken. The evaluation process will be used constructively as a
system to improve the directors’ and committees’ effectiveness, to maximize
their strength and to tackle
their shortcomings.
In conformity with the requirement of
the Act, the performance evaluation of all the directors shall be done by the entire Board of Directors, excluding the director
being evaluated.
Independent Directors
are duty bound to evaluate
the performance of non – Independent Directors and Board as a whole. The
independent directors of the Company shall hold at least one meeting in a year to review the performance of the non-
Independent Directors, performance of
Managing Director of the Company and Board as a whole, taking into account the
views of executive directors and non-executive
directors.
EVALUATION FACTORS
The Board of Directors shall pay regards
to the following parameters for the purpose
of evaluating the performance
of a particular director:
In respect of each of the evaluation factors,
various aspects have been provided
to assist with the
evaluation process in respect of performance of Board itself, and of its
committees and individual directors
as such evaluation factors may vary in accordance with their respective functions
and duties.
Evaluation of Independent Director shall be carried on by the entire Board in the same way as it is done for the Executive Directors
of the Company except the Director
getting evaluated.
Appraisal of each Director of the
Company shall be based on the criteria as mentioned herein below.
Rating Scale
Performance |
Rating |
Surpasses Expectations |
3 |
Meets Expectations |
2 |
Below Expectations |
1 |
The Company
has chosen to adopt the following Board
Performance Evaluation
Process:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Some of the specific issues and questions
that should be considered in a performance evaluation of the
entire Board by Independent Directors, are set out below:
S. No |
Particulars |
Ratings |
Remarks |
1. |
a. Structure of the Board: |
||
i. Competency of directors: Whether Board
as a whole has directors with a proper
mix of
competencies to conduct its affairs effectively. |
|
|
|
ii. Experience of directors: Whether Board
as a whole has directors with enough experience to conduct its affairs effectively.
|
|||
iii. Mix of qualifications: Whether Board as a whole
has directors with a proper
mix of
qualifications to conduct
its affairs effectively.
|
|||
iv. Diversity in Board under
various parameters: Gender/background/ competence/experience, etc. – Whether
there is sufficient diversity in the Board on
the aforesaid parameters.
|
|||
v. Appointment
to the Board: Whether the process of appointment to the Board
of directors is clear and
transparent and includes provisions to consider diversity of thought, experience, knowledge, perspective
and gender in the Board of directors.
|
|||
|
b. Meetings of the Board |
||
i. Regularity of meetings: Whether meetings are being held on a regular basis
|
|
|
|
ii. Frequency 1. Whether the Board
meets frequently 2.
Whether the frequency of such meetings is enough for
the Board to undertake its duties properly
|
|
|
|
iii. Logistics Whether the logistics for the meeting is being handled properly- venue, format, timing, etc.
|
|
|
|
iv. Agenda 1.
Whether the agenda is circulated well before the meeting 2.
Whether the agenda has all relevant information to take decision on the matter 3.
Whether the agenda
is up to date, regularly reviewed and involves major substantial decisions 4.
Whether the
quality of agenda and Board papers is up to the mark (explains issues properly, not overly
lengthy,
etc.) 5.
Whether
outstanding items of previous meetings are followed-up and taken up in subsequent agendas 6.
Whether the time
allotted for the every item (especially substantive items)
in the agenda
of the meeting
is sufficient for adequate discussions on the subject 7.
Whether the Board is able to finish discussion and decision on all
agenda items in the
meetings 8.
Whether adequate and timely inputs are taken
from the Board members prior to
setting of the Agenda for the meeting 9.
Whether the agenda includes
adequate information on Committee’s activities
|
|
|
|
v. Discussions and dissent:
1.
Whether the
Board discusses every issue comprehensively
and depending on the importance of the subject 2.
Whether the
environment of the meeting induces free- flowing free flowing discussions, healthy debate and contribution by everyone without
any fear or favour 3.
Whether the discussions generally add value to the decision making 4. Whether the Board tends
towards groupthink and
whether critical and dissenting suggestions are welcomed 5.
Whether all members actively participate in the discussions 6.
Whether overall,
the Board functions constructively as a team
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
vi. Recording of minutes: 1.
Whether the minutes are being recorded properly- clearly, completely, accurately and consistently. 2.
Whether the minutes are approved properly in accordance with set procedures. 3.
Whether the minutes are timely circulated to all the Board members 4. Whether dissenting views
are recorded in the minutes
|
|
|
|
vii. Dissemination of information: 1. Whether all the information pertaining to the meeting are disseminated to the members timely,
frequently, accurately, regularly 2. Whether Board is adequately informed of material matters
in between meetings
|
|
|
c. Functions of the Board |
|||
i. Role
and responsibilities of the
Board: Whether the same are clearly documented
|
|
|
|
ii. Strategy and performance evaluation: 1.
Whether
significant time of the Board is being devoted to management of current and potential strategic issues 2.
Whether various
scenario planning is used to
evaluate strategic risks 3.
Whether the
Board overall reviews and guides corporate
strategy, major plans of action, risk policy, annual budgets and business plans, sets performance
objectives, monitored implementation and corporate performance, and oversees 4. major capital expenditures, acquisitions and divestments.
|
|
|
|
iii.
Governance and compliance
1. Whether adequate time of the Board is being devoted to analyse
and examine governance and
compliance issues 2. Whether the Board
monitors the effectiveness of its governance practices and makes
changes as needed 3. Whether the Board ensures the integrity of the entity’s accounting and financial reporting systems, including the independent
audit, and that appropriate systems of control are in place,
in particular, systems
for risk management, financial and operational control, and compliance with the law and relevant standards. 4. Whether the Board oversees the process of disclosure and communications. 5. Whether the Board
evaluates and analyses the compliance certificate from the auditors / practicing company secretaries regarding compliance
of conditions of corporate governance. |
|
|
|
iv. Evaluation of Risks: 1.
Whether Board
undertakes a review of the high risk
issues
|
|
|
|
|
impacting the organization regularly 2. In assessment of risks, whether it
is ensured that, while rightly
encouraging positive thinking, these do not result in over-optimism that either leads to significant risks not being recognised or exposes the entity to excessive risk.
|
|
|
v. Grievance Redressal for Investors: Whether the Board regularly reviews the grievance
redressal mechanism of investors, details
of grievances received, disposed of and those remaining unresolved. |
|
|
|
vi. Conflict of interest: 1.
Whether the Board monitors and manages potential conflicts of interest of management, members of the Board of directors and shareholders, including
misuse of corporate assets and abuse
in related party transactions 2. Whether a sufficient number of non-executive members of the Board of directors capable of
exercising independent judgement
are assigned to tasks where there is a potential for conflict of interest
|
|
|
|
|
vii. Stakeholder value
and responsibility: 1.
Whether the decision making
process of the Board is adequate to assess creation of stakeholder value 2.
Whether the Board has mechanisms in place to communicate and engage with
various stakeholders 3. Whether the Board acts on a fully informed basis, in good faith,
with due diligence and care, with high ethical
standards and in the best interest of the entity
and the stakeholders. 4. Whether the Board treats shareholders and stakeholders fairly where decisions of the Board of
directors may affect different shareholder/ stakeholder groups differently. 5.
Whether the Board regularly reviews the Business Responsibility Reporting / related corporate social responsibility initiatives of the entity
and contribution to society, environment etc.
|
|
|
viii. Corporate culture and values: Whether the Board
sets a corporate culture and the values by
which executives throughout a group shall
behave
|
|
|
|
ix. Review
of
Board
evaluation: Whether the
Board monitors and reviews the Board evaluation framework. |
|
|
|
x. Facilitation of Independent Directors: Whether the Board facilitates the Independent Directors to perform their role effectively as a
member of the Board of directors
and also a member of a committee of Board of
directors and any criticism by such directors is taken constructively.
|
|
|
|
|
d. Board
and management |
||
|
i.
Evaluation of performance of the management and feedback: 1. Whether the Board evaluates and monitors management, especially the CEO regularly and fairly and provides constructive feedback and strategic guidance 2. Whether the measures used are broad enough to monitor performance of the management 3. Whether the management’s performance is benchmarked against industry peers 4. Whether remuneration of the management is in line with its performance
and with industry peers 5. Whether remuneration of the Board and the management is aligned with the longer term
interests of the entity and its shareholders. 6. Whether the Board selects, compensates, monitors and, when necessary, replaces key managerial personnel
based on such
evaluation. 7.
Whether the Board ‘steps
back’ to assist
executive management by challenging the assumptions underlying strategy, strategic initiatives (such as acquisitions), risk appetite, exposures and the
key areas of the entity’s focus. |
|
|
ii. Independence of the management from the Board: Whether the level of independence of the management from the Board is adequate
|
|
|
|
iii.
Access of the management to the Board and Board access to the management: Whether the Board and the
management are able to actively
access each other and exchange information
|
|
|
|
iv. Secretarial support: Whether adequate secretarial and logistical support
is available for conducting Board meetings
|
|
|
|
v. Fund availability: Whether sufficient funds are made available to the Board for conducting its meeting effectively, seeking expert
advice E.g. Legal,
accounting, etc. |
|
|
|
vi.
Succession plan: Whether an appropriate and adequate succession plan
is in place and is being reviewed and overseen regularly by the Board |
|
|
|
|
e. Professional development |
||
|
i. Whether adequate induction and professional development programmes are made available to new and old directors |
|
|
ii. Whether continuing directors training is provided to ensure that the members
of Board of directors are kept up to date |
|
|
COMMITTEES OF BOARD
The Board has constituted the following committees:
1. Audit Committee;
2.
Nomination and Remuneration Committee; and
3.
Stakeholders Relationship Committee
4.
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee;
For
evaluating the performance of each committee, the Board of Directors shall pay
regards to the
following aspects as set out below:
S.No |
Particulars |
Rating |
Remarks |
1. |
Mandate and composition: Whether the mandate,
composition and working
procedures of committees of the Board of directors is clearly defined
and disclosed. |
|
|
2. |
Effectiveness of the Committee: Whether the Committee has fulfilled its functions as assigned by the
Board and laws as may be applicable |
|
|
3. |
Structure of the Committee and meetings: i. Whether the Committees have been structure properly and regular meetings are being held
ii.
In terms of
discussions, agenda, etc. of the meetings,
similar criteria may be laid down as specified above for the entire Board |
|
|
4. |
Independence of
the
Committee from
the
Board: Whether adequate independence of the Committee is ensured from the Board |
|
|
5. |
Contribution to decisions of the Board:
Whether the Committee’s recommendations contribute effectively to decisions of the Board. |
|
|
INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS (INCLUDING MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, NON-INDEPENDENT
DIRECTORS, ETC.)
Some of the specific issues and questions
that should be considered in a performance evaluation of Independent Director, in which the concerned
director being evaluated shall not be included, are set out below:
Name of Director
being assessed:
S. No. |
Assessment Criteria |
Rating |
Remarks/ Comments |
1. |
General |
||
a. Fulfillment of functions: Whether the person understands
and fulfills the functions to him/her as assigned by the Board
and the law (E.g. Law imposes certain
obligations on Independent Directors) b. Ability to function as a team: Whether the person is able
to function as an effective team-
member c. Initiative: Whether the person actively takes initiative
with respect to various areas d.
Availability and attendance: Whether
the person is available for
meetings of the Board and attends the meeting regularly and timely, without
delay. e. Commitment: Whether the person is
adequately committed to the Board and
the entity f.
Contribution: Whether the person
contributed effectively to the entity
and in the Board meetings g.
Integrity: Whether the person
demonstrates highest level
of integrity (including conflict of interest disclosures, maintenance of confidentiality, etc.) |
|
|
|
2. |
Additional criteria for Independent director |
||
a. Independence: Whether person
is independent from the entity
and the other directors and there if no conflict of interest b.
Independent views and judgement: Whether the person
exercises his/ her own judgement and voices
opinion freely |
|
|
|
3. |
Additional criteria for Managing Director |
||
a.
Effectiveness of leadership and ability to steer the meetings: Whether the Managing Director displays
efficient leadership, is open- minded, decisive, courteous, displays professionalism, able to coordinate the discussion, etc. and is
overall able to steer the meeting effectively b.
Impartiality: Whether the Managing Director is impartial in conducting discussions, seeking views and dealing
with dissent, etc. c.
Commitment: Whether the Managing Director is sufficiently committed to the
Board and its meetings. d.
Ability to keep shareholders’ interests in mind:
Whether the Managing Director is able to keep
shareholders’ interest in mind during discussions and decisions. |
|
|
EFFECTIVE
DATE
This Policy is effective from the 05th
Day of September 2022 as approved by the Board of Directors of the Company.
REVIEW
The performance evaluation process will be reviewed annually
by the “Nomination and Remuneration Committee”.
Subject to the approval of Board of Directors, the Committee may amend the Policy, if required, to ascertain its appropriateness as per the needs of the Company.
DISCLOSURE
Company will disclose details of its Board Performance
Evaluation processes in its Board’s Report.
The Board’s report containing such statement shall indicate the manner in which
formal evaluation has been made by
the Board of its own performance and that of the committees of the Board and individual directors
of the Company.
DISCLOSURES
The Company shall
disclose the Policy on its website.
***************